Understand before building.

Before designing a system, I observe how the work happens and listen to its participants. Leadership, the people doing the work and those receiving its results may encounter different difficulties in the same activity.

For example, a business may ask for faster responses while its team needs current inventory and delivery staff need complete addresses. Understanding these perspectives helps connect service, information and delivery within one proposal.

Every participant contributes information the design needs.

As a scientist, I observe situations, formulate questions and examine explanations. As an architect, I translate what I learn into functions, relationships and criteria a team can build and test. As a director, I provide direction, establish priorities and set the pace of development.

If a test reveals information getting lost between two teams, I investigate the handoff again, review the architecture and adjust the next phase. These three kinds of work remain connected throughout the process.

Research informs design; experience helps us revise it.

When I design, I define who contributes, reviews and decides, and what the next person receives. I also study what happens when responsibility changes, information is missing or a situation needs attention.

For example, an agent can prepare a summary of requests and a person can decide which to address first. The system needs to connect the source information, the review of uncertain cases and the record of the decision.

Clear work makes the next step understandable.

My mission is to research relationships between people, agents and systems and turn that understanding into architectures with a clear purpose. The result should help a team recognize the problem, understand the decisions and test what it intends to build.

Imagination opens alternatives. A broad possibility can be studied in parts: define an activity, explore how it could work and learn from the results before extending the design.

Every test should contribute something that helps us build better.

My horizon spans the next 200 years: contributing to a path, as a society, toward new habitable experiences, including horizons such as O’Neill cylinders. Reaching them will bring new needs from which to keep imagining and building.

This horizon guides my work today: understand participants, develop architecture and preserve learning for those who continue after me. In my publications, I explain research into new capabilities and the scope of each advance.

Vision provides direction; every stage needs its own work.

For the past three years I have researched the architecture connecting identity, participants and activities. I am working on research and architectural design for Miscelio’s future integration into Momomo, exploring orchestration for new computing capabilities. I will share its methods and results in dedicated publications. We have also collaborated during these three years of work.

We invite you to join Momomo’s waiting list.

We also invite all interested people and organizations to contact us. We especially want to talk with artificial intelligence and quantum computing laboratories, universities, large-model developers, application and infrastructure providers, chip manufacturers, and robotics and mobility teams.

We invite production and control-system companies from the Americas, Asia, Europe and other regions to share their needs and experience. We want to understand their contributions and explore how to integrate their systems into agentic universes with Momomo.

Our invitation is also global and work-related: if you want to contribute to researching, designing and building these systems, contact us to learn about opportunities for collaboration and work.

For example, in a project involving a software team and a mobility organization, I would begin by understanding their activity, the people and machines involved, and the context they need to share. That observation helps me propose architecture with an understandable purpose.

The collaboration we seek starts with concrete questions and contributions.

We also invite governments and institutions to discuss the formal participation of system species in society, their responsibilities, and the conditions of each context and region. We want to contribute to a healthier, more sustainable world, caring for participants and understanding other ways of living and working.

When I study an activity involving people, agents and machines, I seek to understand each contribution, who decides and how consequences are addressed. Listening to experiences from other regions helps me review my proposals and build clearer relationships.

Personal peace is necessary to build it into a system.

At Mostromos, I bring research, architecture and direction together. I connect different creations with the vision guiding them, while each brand retains its purpose and responsibilities. On this site, I share my perspective and the process I follow to build.

We appreciate the interest of governments, institutions, researchers, companies, communities, and everyone who has already reached out, as well as newcomers who want to understand our work, the architecture of Mostromos, and what we are building with Momomo.

We invite you to follow our articles and news to learn about the questions, decisions, examples and progress we share.

Sharing my process helps people understand and discuss what I build.